Tuesday, August 05, 2008
30% say ,"Who is on First"
Updated and much shorter version of Who's on First, for the pollster set is here.
A sample (courtesy of Bruce McCall and The New Yorker):
"Yet, in answer to the question “Would you go before a firing squad to protect higher pollen counts?,” fewer than .03 per cent of those who identified themselves as likely McCain voters understood the question. By a plurality of four to one and counting, not counting those who did not, the Undecideds squared off in a donnybrook with the Don’t Knows, broken up by the Have No Opinions Worth Mentioning. The I Forgets stood on the sidelines."
While I'm on Abbott & Costello, a little YouTube on the math that must have been used over at Freddie's and Fannie's.
A sample (courtesy of Bruce McCall and The New Yorker):
"Yet, in answer to the question “Would you go before a firing squad to protect higher pollen counts?,” fewer than .03 per cent of those who identified themselves as likely McCain voters understood the question. By a plurality of four to one and counting, not counting those who did not, the Undecideds squared off in a donnybrook with the Don’t Knows, broken up by the Have No Opinions Worth Mentioning. The I Forgets stood on the sidelines."
While I'm on Abbott & Costello, a little YouTube on the math that must have been used over at Freddie's and Fannie's.
Labels: New Yorker
Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home Verging on Pertinence Just some more disposable thoughts clogging up the hinterlands
<< Home Verging on Pertinence Just some more disposable thoughts clogging up the hinterlands
